<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>John Robert Pennington Photography &#187; Artwork reproduction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnrobertpennington.com/blog/category/john-robert-pennington-photography/artwork-reproduction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnrobertpennington.com/blog</link>
	<description>www.JohnRobertPennington.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 21:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Artist Patricia Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.johnrobertpennington.com/blog/2009/11/artist-patricia-smith/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johnrobertpennington.com/blog/2009/11/artist-patricia-smith/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Robert Pennington</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artwork reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patricia smith]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnrobertpennington.com/blog/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patricia Smith is an oil, acrylic, and mixed media artist at the Workhouse Art Center over in Lorton, Virginia.  Photographing Pat’s work is like opening up Christmas present in December, I am always amazed by the content she paints.  What an imagination!
On a side note, Pat has always been so kind to my fiancée Grace [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.johnrobertpennington.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5qb2hucm9iZXJ0cGVubmluZ3Rvbi5jb20vYmxvZy93cC1jb250ZW50L3VwbG9hZHMvMjAwOS8xMS9Ib21hZ2VUb1N1ZmZyYWdpc3QtVGhlYXRlci5qcGc="><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-316" style="border: 5px solid black; margin: 10px;" title="HomageToSuffragist: Theater" src="http://www.johnrobertpennington.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/HomageToSuffragist-Theater.jpg" alt="Homage To Suffragist: Theater by Patricia Smith" width="201" height="300" /></a>Patricia Smith is an oil, acrylic, and mixed media artist at the Workhouse Art Center over in Lorton, Virginia.  Photographing Pat’s work is like opening up Christmas present in December, I am always amazed by the content she paints.  What an imagination!</p>
<p>On a side note, Pat has always been so kind to my fiancée <a title=\"Grace's blog and website.\" href="http://www.johnrobertpennington.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL2dyYWNlcGVubmluZ3Rvbi5jb20=" target=\"_blank\">Grace Kettell</a> and I.  She will include a little tip while instructing Grace and I to go on a “hot date.” How can you turn that down?</p>
<p>So everyone please show some love for Patricia Smith by visiting her website at <a title=\"Artist Patricia Smith's website\" href="http://www.johnrobertpennington.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5wYXRyaWNpYXRoZXBhaW50ZXIuY29t" target=\"_blank\">www.patriciathepainter.com</a></p>
<p>Grace and Peace</p>
<p>-Images used by permission from the artist, copyright is solely of Patricia Smith.  Please do not use images without expressed written consent of Patricia Smith, the artist.</p>
 <img src="http://www.johnrobertpennington.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=315" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johnrobertpennington.com/blog/2009/11/artist-patricia-smith/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When should I upgrade?: Technical Limitations</title>
		<link>http://www.johnrobertpennington.com/blog/2009/09/when-should-i-upgrade-technical-limitations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johnrobertpennington.com/blog/2009/09/when-should-i-upgrade-technical-limitations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 20:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Robert Pennington</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artwork reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Robert Pennington Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portrait]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts/Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tutorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welcome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ansel adams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[henri cartier-bresson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richard avedon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technical limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[when should I upgrade?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnrobertpennington.com/blog/?p=223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier I urged the importance of knowledge acquisition over photographic equipment upgrades.  I would like to continue the series of “When should I upgrade?” with the next topic of technical limitations.

Technical Limitations
More expensive, higher mega-pixels, bigger sensor, quicker frames-per-second is always better,  right? I will argue that when considering the best photographic “upgrades,” [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title=\"When Should I upgrade?: Knowledge\" href="http://www.johnrobertpennington.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5qb2hucm9iZXJ0cGVubmluZ3Rvbi5jb20vYmxvZy8yMDA5LzA1LzIxL3doZW4tc2hvdWxkLWktdXBncmFkZS1rbm93bGVkZ2Uv" target=\"_self\">Earlier</a> I urged the importance of knowledge acquisition over photographic equipment upgrades.  I would like to continue the series of “When should I upgrade?” with the next topic of technical limitations.<br />
<strong><br />
Technical Limitations</strong></p>
<p>More expensive, higher mega-pixels, bigger sensor, quicker frames-per-second is always better,  right? I will argue that when considering the best photographic “upgrades,” equipment that seems lacking technically may be the most appropriate.<span id="more-223"></span></p>
<div class="im"><strong>Brief and rough history lesson:</strong></div>
<p>From roughly the 1890&#8217;s to about the 1950&#8217;s,  large and medium format cameras were the mainstay of photographers. Names such as Ansel Adams and Richard Avedon deployed these cameras in and out of the studio.  The common 8&#215;10 inches, 4&#215;5 inches, and 120 format films provided an enormous amount of information and detail which allowed for large, occasional life-sized, tack sharp prints. But while these film types and cameras rendered superior quality, they were clumsy, large, heavy, and slow to deploy. These characteristics made for capturing spontaneous and fleeting moments almost impossible to photograph without much forethought and preparation. But during the 1920&#8217;s-1930&#8217;s,  a new line of cameras and a French  photographer were dedicated to capturing the “decisive moment.”</p>
<p>Although the 35mm film was in use before the now legendary Leica cameras, it was the Leica that popularized it. While the Leica’s optics and quality made it suitable for professionals, its compact size made it easy to carry and deploy (“point and shoot” if I might say). This quick fire camera was ideal for master photographer Henri Cartier-Bresson who desired to capture the what he called the “decisive moment.” Cartier-Bresson, with his Leica and 50mm lens, has been credited with creating what many photographers refer to today as “street photography.” Prowling and stalking the streets, he would search for interesting moments while maintaining supreme composition. One of his greatest images, “Behind the Gare St. Lazare,” which depicts a Frenchman jumping over/into a large puddle of water, was taken through a gap in the fence. Imagine attempting to capture that spontaneous moment with a large or medium format camera. For Cartier-Bresson, the 35mm Leica with a smaller negative format,  made it possible to photograph his many iconic images.</p>
<div class="im"><strong>Brief and rough lesson about this history:</strong></div>
<blockquote>
<div class="im">&#8220;For us the camera is a tool, the extension of our eye, not a pretty little mechanical toy. It is sufficient that we should feel at ease with the camera best adapted for our purpose. Adjustments of the camera &#8211; such as setting the aperture and the speed &#8211; should become reflexes, like changing gear in a car.  The real problem is one of intelligence and sensitivity.&#8221;</div>
<div class="im">-Henri Cartier-Bresson</div>
</blockquote>
<div class="im">It is of my opinion that the majority of photographers are great impersonators of children, myself included. Our outlook on cameras and photography equipment is of “a pretty little mechanical toy[s].”   Newer cameras come to the market and just as kids tire of their toys, photographers tire of their camera. We falsely assume that newer  “mechanical toys” will improve our photographs, or worse, are an attempt to impress friends or fellow enthusiasts. It is this mentality that we as photographers must come to terms with. In order to intelligently determine the technical limitations of equipment “best adapted for our purpose,” photographers must first view equipment as tools instead of toys. Once we view them as a tools, its adopted purpose will become apparent. Then our equipment choices and purchases will reflect not only a potential savings in the bank account,  but it will also be “sufficient that we should feel at ease” with these selections.</div>
<p>Now I understand that digital sensors are a newer technology which have quickly evolved, making the &#8220;lacking&#8221; 3 mega-pixel sensors obsolete.  But with the average consumer point and shoot camera floating at 10 mega-pixels, is being able to print solid 4&#215;6 and 5&#215;7 prints a concern?  How often does the average photographer print over 5&#215;7 or even print at all? Does even a 10 mega-pixel sensor matter if the pictures are to be uploaded to Flickr at 600&#215;400 pixels (which by the way isn‘t even equivalent to 1 mega-pixel)?  So let us forget about mega-pixels and focus on the other technical limitations of the camera.</p>
<p>We need to remember that photographers create photographs. This seems obvious, but often when it come to equipment, we tend to be collectors of “toys“ rather than creators with “tools.” All photography equipment contains weaknesses,  so is imperative that we consider the technical limitation of every piece of equipment and choose the most appropriate piece for our purpose just as Henri Cartier-Bresson did with his 35mm Leica and 50mm lens.  Sometimes this will mean purchasing relatively less capable equipment that better suit’s a given photographic situation. So as I opened, when considering the best photographic “upgrades,” equipment which seems lacking technically may be the most appropriate.  If your current equipment is appropriate and changing settings has become an extension of your arms, then “feel at ease” and don’t upgrade. Go capture those “decisive moments” until that camera breaks, then upgrade.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Photography has not changed since its origin except in its technical aspects, which for me are not important.&#8221;<br />
- Henri Cartier-Bresson</p></blockquote>
<p>Grace and Peace</p>
 <img src="http://www.johnrobertpennington.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=223" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johnrobertpennington.com/blog/2009/09/when-should-i-upgrade-technical-limitations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mary Gallagher Stout</title>
		<link>http://www.johnrobertpennington.com/blog/2009/03/mary-gallagher-stout/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johnrobertpennington.com/blog/2009/03/mary-gallagher-stout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Robert Pennington</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artwork reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gallagher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproduce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stout]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnrobertpennington.com/blog/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had the pleasure and opportunity to photograph several pieces by Mary Gallagher Stout, an acrylic and mixed media artist.  An artist which has substance beyond the brush strokes is always a delight, and Mary is just that. The &#8216;meaning of life&#8217; and the &#8216;vanity of ones existence&#8217; are thoughts that could pass through ones thinking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_59" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 248px"><a href="http://www.johnrobertpennington.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL21hcnlnYWxsYWdoZXJzdG91dC5hcnRzcGFuLmNvbS8=" target=\"_blank\"><img class="size-medium wp-image-59" title="Falling" src="http://www.johnrobertpennington.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/falling-238x300.jpg" alt="Falling by Mary Gallagher Sout" width="238" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Falling by Mary Gallagher Stout</p></div>
<p>I had the pleasure and opportunity to photograph several pieces by Mary Gallagher Stout, an acrylic and mixed media artist. <span id="more-36"></span> An artist which has substance beyond the brush strokes is always a delight, and Mary is just that. The &#8216;meaning of life&#8217; and the &#8216;vanity of ones existence&#8217; are thoughts that could pass through ones thinking cap.  Just ask her about vacuums. On a side note,  if a history lesson in music is desired, just ask Mary to shuffle play her iTunes list.</p>
<p>Please visit Mary&#8217;s websites at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.johnrobertpennington.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL21hcnlnYWxsYWdoZXJzdG91dC5hcnRzcGFuLmNvbS8=" target=\"_blank\">www.marygallagherstout.artspan.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.johnrobertpennington.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5kZWNvcmF0aXZlcGFuYWNoZS5jb20v" target=\"_blank\">www.decorativepanache.com</a></p>
<p>I will be posting on the importance that a professional photographer can have on photographing art.</p>
<p>Grace and Peace</p>
<p>-Images used by permission from the artist,  copyright is solely of Mary Gallagher Stout.  Please do not use images without expressed written consent of Mary Gallagher Stout, the artist.</p>
 <img src="http://www.johnrobertpennington.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=36" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johnrobertpennington.com/blog/2009/03/mary-gallagher-stout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
