When should I upgrade?: Technical Limitations

Written by John Robert Pennington on September 9th, 2009

Earlier I urged the importance of knowledge acquisition over photographic equipment upgrades. I would like to continue the series of “When should I upgrade?” with the next topic of technical limitations.

Technical Limitations

More expensive, higher mega-pixels, bigger sensor, quicker frames-per-second is always better, right? I will argue that when considering the best photographic “upgrades,” equipment that seems lacking technically may be the most appropriate.

Brief and rough history lesson:

From roughly the 1890’s to about the 1950’s, large and medium format cameras were the mainstay of photographers. Names such as Ansel Adams and Richard Avedon deployed these cameras in and out of the studio. The common 8×10 inches, 4×5 inches, and 120 format films provided an enormous amount of information and detail which allowed for large, occasional life-sized, tack sharp prints. But while these film types and cameras rendered superior quality, they were clumsy, large, heavy, and slow to deploy. These characteristics made for capturing spontaneous and fleeting moments almost impossible to photograph without much forethought and preparation. But during the 1920’s-1930’s, a new line of cameras and a French photographer were dedicated to capturing the “decisive moment.”

Although the 35mm film was in use before the now legendary Leica cameras, it was the Leica that popularized it. While the Leica’s optics and quality made it suitable for professionals, its compact size made it easy to carry and deploy (“point and shoot” if I might say). This quick fire camera was ideal for master photographer Henri Cartier-Bresson who desired to capture the what he called the “decisive moment.” Cartier-Bresson, with his Leica and 50mm lens, has been credited with creating what many photographers refer to today as “street photography.” Prowling and stalking the streets, he would search for interesting moments while maintaining supreme composition. One of his greatest images, “Behind the Gare St. Lazare,” which depicts a Frenchman jumping over/into a large puddle of water, was taken through a gap in the fence. Imagine attempting to capture that spontaneous moment with a large or medium format camera. For Cartier-Bresson, the 35mm Leica with a smaller negative format, made it possible to photograph his many iconic images.

Brief and rough lesson about this history:
“For us the camera is a tool, the extension of our eye, not a pretty little mechanical toy. It is sufficient that we should feel at ease with the camera best adapted for our purpose. Adjustments of the camera – such as setting the aperture and the speed – should become reflexes, like changing gear in a car. The real problem is one of intelligence and sensitivity.”
-Henri Cartier-Bresson
It is of my opinion that the majority of photographers are great impersonators of children, myself included. Our outlook on cameras and photography equipment is of “a pretty little mechanical toy[s].” Newer cameras come to the market and just as kids tire of their toys, photographers tire of their camera. We falsely assume that newer “mechanical toys” will improve our photographs, or worse, are an attempt to impress friends or fellow enthusiasts. It is this mentality that we as photographers must come to terms with. In order to intelligently determine the technical limitations of equipment “best adapted for our purpose,” photographers must first view equipment as tools instead of toys. Once we view them as a tools, its adopted purpose will become apparent. Then our equipment choices and purchases will reflect not only a potential savings in the bank account, but it will also be “sufficient that we should feel at ease” with these selections.

Now I understand that digital sensors are a newer technology which have quickly evolved, making the “lacking” 3 mega-pixel sensors obsolete. But with the average consumer point and shoot camera floating at 10 mega-pixels, is being able to print solid 4×6 and 5×7 prints a concern? How often does the average photographer print over 5×7 or even print at all? Does even a 10 mega-pixel sensor matter if the pictures are to be uploaded to Flickr at 600×400 pixels (which by the way isn‘t even equivalent to 1 mega-pixel)? So let us forget about mega-pixels and focus on the other technical limitations of the camera.

We need to remember that photographers create photographs. This seems obvious, but often when it come to equipment, we tend to be collectors of “toys“ rather than creators with “tools.” All photography equipment contains weaknesses, so is imperative that we consider the technical limitation of every piece of equipment and choose the most appropriate piece for our purpose just as Henri Cartier-Bresson did with his 35mm Leica and 50mm lens. Sometimes this will mean purchasing relatively less capable equipment that better suit’s a given photographic situation. So as I opened, when considering the best photographic “upgrades,” equipment which seems lacking technically may be the most appropriate. If your current equipment is appropriate and changing settings has become an extension of your arms, then “feel at ease” and don’t upgrade. Go capture those “decisive moments” until that camera breaks, then upgrade.

“Photography has not changed since its origin except in its technical aspects, which for me are not important.”
- Henri Cartier-Bresson

Grace and Peace

John Robert Pennington Photography Blog
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • Mixx
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • email

Leave a Comment





SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline